Virtual Briefcase | Search | Login    
RSNA 2005 > Initial Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ...
 

  CODE: SSG01-05
  SESSION: ISP: Breast (Digital Mammography)
  Initial Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in 99 Breasts of 98 Women with Abnormal Digital Screening Mammography

TOOLS
 
Add to Briefcase
  Print
  Email Event
PARTICIPANTS
Presenter
Steven Poplack MD
Abstract Co-Author
Christine Kogel
Helene Nagy MD
- Author stated no financial disclosure

- Disclosure information unavailable
  DATE: Tuesday, November 29 2005
  START TIME: 11:10 AM
  END TIME: 11:20 AM
  LOCATION: Arie Crown Theater

 PURPOSE
 
To provide pilot data and gain insight into the potential role of tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
  
 METHOD AND MATERIALS
 
Women with abnormal digital screening mammography requiring additional diagnostic mammography were recruited sequentially. After providing consent, women underwent tomosynthesis of the affected breast. Up to 3 tomosynthesis views were performed, corresponding to the views obtained with diagnostic mammography. One of two breast imaging specialists reviewed the tomosynthesis exam prospectively and then in comparison to diagnostic mammography.
  
 RESULTS
 
There were 99 affected breasts with 106 findings in 98 women. 71/99(72%) had two tomosynthesis views, 22/99(22%) had 3 views, and 6/99(6%) had a single view. Recalled findings included, asymmetry 64/106(57%), mass 17/106(16%), calcifications 17/106(16%), and architectural distortion 8/106(8%). Approximately half 49/99(49%) of the subjects would not have been recalled on the basis of tomosynthesis. 38/49(78%) had a finding type of asymmetry. Four of these 49 subjects underwent biopsy yielding 3 benign results and a 1 cm. mucinous carcinoma. The mucinous carcinoma was detected incidentally by sonography and did not represent the finding recalled by screening mammography. In retrospect it was visible with tomosynthesis but not mammography. Tomosynthesis was equivalent (n=49), or superior (n=37), to diagnostic mammography in 86/99(87%) of subjects. Calcifications accounted for 9/13(69%) of cases in which diagnostic mammography performed better than tomosynthesis. Subject outcomes included routine or short interval follow-up in 79/99(80%), and biopsy in 20/99(20%). Four subjects had invasive carcinoma (2-invasive ductal, 1-invasive lobular, 1-mucinous carcinoma)and 3 had high risk pathology results.
  
 CONCLUSION
 
These results are preliminary and require validation in a larger more rigorous trial. In comparison to mammography, digital tomosynthesis holds great promise as a more specific screening technique, and equivalent or superior diagnostic technique. These data provide initial estimates of recall rate reduction and diagnostic equivalence of tomosynthesis, which may be used to plan future tomosynthesis research.
  
 DISCLOSURE
 
S.P.: Serves as a scientific advisory board member for Hologic Inc..
  

Copyright © 2005 Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
820 Jorie Boulevard, Oak Brook, IL 60523-2251 || (630) 571-2670 || fax (630) 571-7837
U.S. and Canada: Main (800) 381-6660, Membership (877) RSNA-MEM (776-2636)
CLUSTER 1